Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 23:51

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Patti LuPone stuns Broadway as The Apologizer - AV Club
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Can Scale AI and Alexandr Wang reignite Meta’s AI efforts? - TechCrunch
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Australia's Qantas to close budget airline Jetstar Asia - BBC
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What do you think hell is like?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Here’s what everyone should know about this new HIV prevention shot - The Washington Post
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Are judges being lenient on hard criminals?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.